I started this newsletter in part for some people I met who weren’t traditionally conservative so I stay away from politics, but since gun bans are the big news I know people are rushing out to buy guns before a potential ban. Some readers are probably asking themselves if they need one and I hope to help you come to a conclusion with some information I present.
You will find lots of prepper lists of the benefits of AR-15s that make valid points like that ARs being so popular means you can find parts and ammunition, you can standardize “kit’ for the make shift militia some people think will form etc, but that is advanced prepper thought for lack of a better word. Those are points made for people who already know about guns and are now just indulging in the hobby aspect of prepping – that is arguing about guns and gear.
I’m going to just quickly run down some of the specific benefits of this platform in my opinion, and some specific circumstances in which I would recommend one. I leave it to you to decide if any of this applies to you or if you even agree with me. As for experience with the platform I in fact shot an M-16 A2 once and spoke with people who used them professionally. This was in the 90s and at the time these were still considered delicate rifles that needed lots of maintenance. The one I fired jammed twice and I had to be taught the tap and rack jam clearing technique. This put me off ARs for a long time. I’m told they’ve become much better now.
The U.S. Army began a search for a rifle to replace the M1 Garand. While the Garand served admirable in World War II, all that combat use uncovered some areas for improvement. For example, soldiers wanted more magazinecapacity than the eight rounds offered by the M1 Garand. Also, weight was an issue, with the M1 tipping the scale at ten and a half pounds. With World War II soldiers carrying their gearfor (literally) years at a time, every pound counted. Front runners in the contest were an updated design based on the M1, the Springfield Armory T-44 and the T-48, which was based on the FAL design. ArmaLite submits plans for the AR-10 rifle with similar caliber and performance characteristics as the T-44 and T-48. Unlike the others, the AR-10 incorporated radical design changes that allowed use of lightweight aluminum receivers and plastic stocks and hand guards. The key to the design was using a steel barrel extension to lock up the bolt rather than the receiver itself. This allowed use of lighter and less strong materials for receiver construction. The AR-10 weighed less than seven pounds – in theory allowing a solider to carry three extra pounds of ammunition and/or gear
ArmaLite entered the contest too late in the game to work out new design kinks and ultimately the T-44 was adopted as the M-14 Rifle in 1959.
1956
Seeing possibility in the AR-10 design, the Army asks ArmaLite to work on a smaller caliber version to be named the AR 15 Rifle. The project is exploratory, as the military doctrine of the time called for large caliber rifles to be used in engagements at longer distances. 1956 – 1959
ArmaLite sells the AR-10 internationally through a licensing agreement with Artillerie Inrichtingen, the Dutch Arsenal. Not even the Dutch adopt the AR-10 and international sales are light. At this time, ArmaLite is only really selling the AR-5 aquatic survival rifle, so revenue pressures mount. 1959
ArmaLite licenses both the AR-10 and AR 15 designs to Colt Firearms. Robert Fremont, a key player in the design team of the AR-10 and AR 15 Rifle models, leaves ArmaLite for Colt Firearms to help with continued AR rifle development. ArmaLite launches the AR-7 Survival Rifle. The AR-7 was a .22 long rifle caliber rifle targeted at the civilian market, although a number of military organizations around the world bought it. Colt Firearms sells the first AR 15 rifles to the Federation of Malaya, later to become known as Malaysia.
To summarize after WWII the militaries of the world were trying to modernize their arsenals and ArmaLite (what the AR in AR-15 stands for) was making “space age” designs that allowed them to shave weight off their guns and increase magazine capacity. One of the reasons a AR-15s that are built more traditionally have a retro-futurism look to them is that they were produced in the time period retro futurism emulates – a time of rapid and amazing advances.
Small Wars Journal
Now for the million dollar question – do you need one? My answer is you might if…
You’re recoil sensitive or slight of stature:
Your home defense includes a large outdoor space:
You live in an area with extended police response times:
If you might be targeted by mob violence:
Varminting:
But also to be frank – just liking something and wanting it is enough reason to own it.
Show me your AR on Instagram
https://www.instagram.com/oldtimeypistolero/
Source link
Author Rob Taylor