Paul Mason, Stephanie Hare, and Freddie Sayers discuss whether fact-checking is a necessity or a fad, and how companies and governments should approach it.
In light of Meta’s recent decision, do you think fact-checking is a must?
With a free trial, you can watch the full debate NOW at
“The truth is rarely pure and never simple”, said Oscar Wilde. Yet in today’s world many are looking for assurance that they are being told the truth. From Facebook and Twitter, to the BBC, New York Times, and a host of companies offering fact checking services, there is no shortage of organisations claiming to determine the ‘facts’. But is this a credible goal? Western governments point to Russian and Chinese “fact-checkers” as state propaganda. Yet, they do the same to us. The American government sought to bring in a Disinformation Board. Within weeks it had to be abandoned due to public and partisan outrage.
Should we recognise that all organisations, and individuals, embed a perspective in their claims and their assessment of the facts? Is fact checking a marketing exercise to appear trustworthy while in reality demonstrating the opposite? Or in an internet age where fantastical claims are presented as truths, is it essential that we seek to call these out?
#facts #factcheckers #posttruth #meta #zuckerberg
Renowned journalist Paul Mason, author of Technology is Not Neutral Stephanie Hare, and UnHerd editor Freddie Sayers debate the facts behind the facts. Hilary Lawson hosts.
The Institute of Art and Ideas features videos and articles from cutting edge thinkers discussing the ideas that are shaping the world, from metaphysics to string theory, technology to democracy, aesthetics to genetics. Subscribe today!
00:00 Introduction
00:20 What do we do about the facts?
00:50 Elite control of facts
03:00 Right-wing libertarians
05:10 Different fact-checkers
07:26 In defence of the fact-checkers
For debates and talks:
For articles:
For courses:
The Institute of Art and Ideas
source
