Icke takes what he hears from others without careful consideration and analysis before coming up with his own easy-to-digest narrative. He doesn’t look at legalities nor fully understand everything he talks about. He sounds good, right? But the devil is in the details. He’s no threat to the systems because he is misleading enough, not educating, and not posing workable solutions. A public of uneducated ignorant people is where they want us so they can rule without valid resistance, angry mobs that do nothing, no legal premises, twisted stories, poor evidence, etc. That fits right in. And boy do people get angry if you try to show them otherwise so they can take good action that scares the rulers. Critical thinking is lost on followers and mobs.
I’m not saying everything Icke says is wrong, but lacks important details, if not honesty. He’s taking a position of popularity and authority without having the background to prove his full understanding and rationale on subjects he discusses or opposes. His audiences miss this part about him and just label him willy-nilly without references, explanation, observation, and evidence. Just big, overrated nothing burgers, yelling and petitioning for the sake of releasing emotions. And this signals to the ones in-the-know who control businesses and government that people are still not formidable opponents to their ways.
I sincerely doubt he’s been banned from traveling and more likely he has no energy or desire to travel in his condition. But that banning story garners a lot of popular attention.
Source link
Author hugotalking
